7200.11 st3500320AS read error UNC

Moderator: Nick_TS


robert258
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: 21.01.09
Reputation: 0 / (0)

7200.11 st3500320AS read error UNC

Postby robert258 » 02.02.09, 08:11

The track is unable to read 85%
500GB(976773168) only read to 170773168 sector
snap0140.jpg
snap0140.jpg (134.3 KiB) Viewed 6201 times

how can slave it ?


Pepe
New user
Posts: 92
Joined: 26.12.08
Reputation: 2 / (23)

Re: 7200.11 st3500320AS read error UNC

Postby Pepe » 03.02.09, 01:18

robert258 wrote:The track is unable to read 85%
500GB(976773168) only read to 170773168 sector
snap0140.jpg

how can slave it ?



this is because u or somebody did a translator regeneration that did not run perfectly and the new user slip list is missing some sectors that the old one had.
Utility current version cannot handle it.
I can if U don't mind sending it.

pepe


robert258
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: 21.01.09
Reputation: 0 / (0)

Re: 7200.11 st3500320AS read error UNC

Postby robert258 » 07.02.09, 03:59

I am in Asia, you can provide the solution?
Pepe wrote:I can if U don't mind sending it.


Pepe
New user
Posts: 92
Joined: 26.12.08
Reputation: 2 / (23)

Re: 7200.11 st3500320AS read error UNC

Postby Pepe » 07.02.09, 19:17

first u have to check how many extra sectors are right before the point it gets unreadable, then add them to the user slip list.

pepe


AJ2008
Posts: 1410
Joined: 25.11.08
Reputation: 12 / (116)

Re: 7200.11 st3500320AS read error UNC

Postby AJ2008 » 10.02.09, 10:49

This is interesting, not seen this fault before! :)


Pepe
New user
Posts: 92
Joined: 26.12.08
Reputation: 2 / (23)

Re: 7200.11 st3500320AS read error UNC

Postby Pepe » 11.02.09, 00:03

My very first 7200.11 had this problem, so the standard solution the utility provides was only partial, I had to dig more deeply and develop some things to solve this problem.

pepe


robert258
Newbie
Posts: 8
Joined: 21.01.09
Reputation: 0 / (0)

Re: 7200.11 st3500320AS read error UNC

Postby robert258 » 16.02.09, 17:59

Pepe wrote:My very first 7200.11 had this problem, so the standard solution the utility provides was only partial, I had to dig more deeply and develop some things to solve this problem.
pepe


oh ! Thank you for your help.


Return to “Archive”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 19 guests