ECC ERROR | SM2258XT Topic is solved

Moderators: Roman_TS, Filipp_TS, Sergey_TS

User avatar
Roman_TS
Site Admin
Posts: 761
Joined: 09.02.11
Reputation: 28 / (278)

Re: ECC ERROR | SM2258XT

Postby Roman_TS » 17.11.25, 21:09

Are you sure? Did you check available loaders? Because officially starting from 7.7x there is no limitations on Samsung chips in SM 2258/59 Utility
With best regards
ACELab Technical Support
ts.acelab.eu.com
blog.acelab.eu.com


MHS-Solutions
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: 01.08.24
Reputation: 0 / (1)

Re: ECC ERROR | SM2258XT

Postby MHS-Solutions » 19.11.25, 10:31

Roman_TS wrote:Source of the post Are you sure? Did you check available loaders? Because officially starting from 7.7x there is no limitations on Samsung chips in SM 2258/59 Utility

Yes we had a teamviewer session,
just to clarify, this is my ssd:

https://forum.acelab.eu.com/viewtopic.php?f=179&t=11439

User avatar
Matheus.recovery
Newbie
Posts: 5
Joined: 15.02.24
Reputation: 0 / (1)

Re: ECC ERROR | SM2258XT

Postby Matheus.recovery » 09.12.25, 22:04

I just finished a job with Chinese SSDs using Samsung chips.. It worked perfectly.

Chips id................................ : EC1C983F84CB
Vendor.................................. : Samsung
Type.................................... : 3dv4-64L TLC 16k

User avatar
Roman_TS
Site Admin
Posts: 761
Joined: 09.02.11
Reputation: 28 / (278)

Re: ECC ERROR | SM2258XT

Postby Roman_TS » 16.12.25, 13:14

An important note for everyone who have SM2258XT/SM2259XT with Samsung chips.

Loaders will work correctly only if there is NO "holes" in Chip ID map. For example, this is a good map without "skipped" IDs:


MEMORY MICROCHIP INFORMATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: : Chip 0 : Chip 1 : Chip 2 : Chip 3 :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Channel 0 : EC1A1AE5 : EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5 :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Channel 1 : EC1A1AE5 : EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Channel 2 : EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Channel 3 : EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

And here is a map, where SSD firmware is using not all CE of the NAND chips. It's not related to bad NAND chips connection, it's about a drive Firmware version. The SUM of ID capacity is the same as the drive capacity, so everything is ok except the allocation if IDs. In this case Samsung Loaders will not work.

MEMORY MICROCHIP INFORMATION
--------------------------------------------
: : Chip 0 : Chip 1 :
--------------------------------------------
: Channel 0 : EC1A1AE5 : EC1A1AE5:
--------------------------------------------
: Channel 1 :
--------------------------------------------
: Channel 2 : EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5:
--------------------------------------------
: Channel 3 :
--------------------------------------------
With best regards
ACELab Technical Support
ts.acelab.eu.com
blog.acelab.eu.com


MHS-Solutions
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: 01.08.24
Reputation: 0 / (1)

Re: ECC ERROR | SM2258XT

Postby MHS-Solutions » 16.02.26, 20:11

Roman_TS wrote:Source of the post An important note for everyone who have SM2258XT/SM2259XT with Samsung chips.

Loaders will work correctly only if there is NO "holes" in Chip ID map. For example, this is a good map without "skipped" IDs:


MEMORY MICROCHIP INFORMATION
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: : Chip 0 : Chip 1 : Chip 2 : Chip 3 :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Channel 0 : EC1A1AE5 : EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5 :
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Channel 1 : EC1A1AE5 : EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Channel 2 : EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
: Channel 3 : EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------

And here is a map, where SSD firmware is using not all CE of the NAND chips. It's not related to bad NAND chips connection, it's about a drive Firmware version. The SUM of ID capacity is the same as the drive capacity, so everything is ok except the allocation if IDs. In this case Samsung Loaders will not work.

MEMORY MICROCHIP INFORMATION
--------------------------------------------
: : Chip 0 : Chip 1 :
--------------------------------------------
: Channel 0 : EC1A1AE5 : EC1A1AE5:
--------------------------------------------
: Channel 1 :
--------------------------------------------
: Channel 2 : EC1A1AE5: EC1A1AE5:
--------------------------------------------
: Channel 3 :
--------------------------------------------


Do you think there will be a solution someday?

User avatar
Roman_TS
Site Admin
Posts: 761
Joined: 09.02.11
Reputation: 28 / (278)

Re: ECC ERROR | SM2258XT

Postby Roman_TS » 19.02.26, 09:31

It's already exist :) But not for unsymmetric CE map.

Of course ACE Lab developers will handle it - previously it was not possible to work with Samsung memory chips at all. Now - we got a partial solution. In the future may appear a complete solution.
With best regards
ACELab Technical Support
ts.acelab.eu.com
blog.acelab.eu.com


MHS-Solutions
Newbie
Posts: 22
Joined: 01.08.24
Reputation: 0 / (1)

Re: ECC ERROR | SM2258XT

Postby MHS-Solutions » 27.02.26, 11:15

Roman_TS wrote:Source of the post It's already exist :) But not for unsymmetric CE map.

Of course ACE Lab developers will handle it - previously it was not possible to work with Samsung memory chips at all. Now - we got a partial solution. In the future may appear a complete solution.

So could the partial solution be helpful for our case with the teamgroup ssd?
If yes, I would love to create a ticket :)!
Otherwise, I will wait for sure.

Edit: we have the unsymetric case, so we still have to wait, thanks for you work.


Return to “Other SSD”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests