Hello
Can someone please tell me where short pins (safe mode) are located.
Photo attached
Thank you
WD Green SSD 20-82-00469-2 (SM2258XT) Short pins
Moderators: Roman_TS, Maxim_TS, Filipp_TS
- alphageeks
- Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 30.12.16
- Reputation: 0 / (0)
WD Green SSD 20-82-00469-2 (SM2258XT) Short pins
- Attachments
-
- compressjpeg.zip
- (1.61 MiB) Downloaded 636 times
Re: WD Green SSD 20-82-00469-2 (SM2258XT) Short pins
Hello.
WD Green can be based on 5 different CPU platforms:
1. SM2258XT
2. Maxiotech
3. Sandisk 82-00-469
4. Lexar DM918
5. Realtek RTK
We can deal with SM2258XT modification, while Maxio and Sandisk modifications are not supported.
Sandisk 82-00469 is a native Sandisk CPU which isn't connected with SM2258XT controller.
WD Green can be based on 5 different CPU platforms:
1. SM2258XT
2. Maxiotech
3. Sandisk 82-00-469
4. Lexar DM918
5. Realtek RTK
We can deal with SM2258XT modification, while Maxio and Sandisk modifications are not supported.
Sandisk 82-00469 is a native Sandisk CPU which isn't connected with SM2258XT controller.
With best regards
ACELab Technical Support
ts.acelab.eu.com
blog.acelab.eu.com
ACELab Technical Support
ts.acelab.eu.com
blog.acelab.eu.com
- alphageeks
- Newbie
- Posts: 4
- Joined: 30.12.16
- Reputation: 0 / (0)
Re: WD Green SSD 20-82-00469-2 (SM2258XT) Short pins
Thanks for you response, any idea when it may be supported?
Re: WD Green SSD 20-82-00469-2 (SM2258XT) Short pins
It's still possible to recover data via Chip-Off, but:
1. NAND chips must be configured in PC-3000 Flash for a correct CE for LUN reading. As the result, you may get a dump with 50% zero sectors after first 50% of DA.
2. There would be a massive number of bit errors, so we should prepare for rereading;
3. Image Building will not be possible, because CPU algorithm is using a lot of different sub-blocks, update-blocks and translator tables to address everything;
4. The only possible result - is a RAW recovery, without Folder Structure. And most likely a lot of data will be damaged with ECC.
At this moment, our developers are working under Sandisk CPU researching to add the native Sandisk CPU-based drives into support list. But at this moment, I'm afraid, we don't have an approximate time when it would be ready.
1. NAND chips must be configured in PC-3000 Flash for a correct CE for LUN reading. As the result, you may get a dump with 50% zero sectors after first 50% of DA.
2. There would be a massive number of bit errors, so we should prepare for rereading;
3. Image Building will not be possible, because CPU algorithm is using a lot of different sub-blocks, update-blocks and translator tables to address everything;
4. The only possible result - is a RAW recovery, without Folder Structure. And most likely a lot of data will be damaged with ECC.
At this moment, our developers are working under Sandisk CPU researching to add the native Sandisk CPU-based drives into support list. But at this moment, I'm afraid, we don't have an approximate time when it would be ready.
With best regards
ACELab Technical Support
ts.acelab.eu.com
blog.acelab.eu.com
ACELab Technical Support
ts.acelab.eu.com
blog.acelab.eu.com
- c.vogl@solution.at
- Newbie
- Posts: 18
- Joined: 12.07.16
- Reputation: 0 / (1)
Re: WD Green SSD 20-82-00469-2 (SM2258XT) Short pins
Hello,
is it also possible to swp the controller? or is it encrypted unique?
is it also possible to swp the controller? or is it encrypted unique?
Re: WD Green SSD 20-82-00469-2 (SM2258XT) Short pins
The main problem of the failed SSD is a damaged Firmware (translator part). So, the question is - how the controller swap will help you?
All unique information is located inside the NAND chips (firmware is located in Service Area - reserved pool for storing service structures and the main firmware). If the problem is inside the FW, then CPU swap will not help you - damaged firmware would be still the main reason of the SSD fault.
NAND swap from damaged SSD to a good donor is recommended only in case if the original PCB has serious issues with the electronic components.
All unique information is located inside the NAND chips (firmware is located in Service Area - reserved pool for storing service structures and the main firmware). If the problem is inside the FW, then CPU swap will not help you - damaged firmware would be still the main reason of the SSD fault.
NAND swap from damaged SSD to a good donor is recommended only in case if the original PCB has serious issues with the electronic components.
With best regards
ACELab Technical Support
ts.acelab.eu.com
blog.acelab.eu.com
ACELab Technical Support
ts.acelab.eu.com
blog.acelab.eu.com
- gameboybin
- New user
- Posts: 53
- Joined: 09.09.20
- Reputation: 0 / (0)
Re: WD Green SSD 20-82-00469-2 (SM2258XT) Short pins
Roman_TS wrote:Source of the post It's still possible to recover data via Chip-Off, but:
1. NAND chips must be configured in PC-3000 Flash for a correct CE for LUN reading. As the result, you may get a dump with 50% zero sectors after first 50% of DA.
2. There would be a massive number of bit errors, so we should prepare for rereading;
3. Image Building will not be possible, because CPU algorithm is using a lot of different sub-blocks, update-blocks and translator tables to address everything;
4. The only possible result - is a RAW recovery, without Folder Structure. And most likely a lot of data will be damaged with ECC.
At this moment, our developers are working under Sandisk CPU researching to add the native Sandisk CPU-based drives into support list. But at this moment, I'm afraid, we don't have an approximate time when it would be ready.
Hey Roman! Should the chips be automatically ID in the PC3000 Flash. Just wanted to get the dumps out
Re: WD Green SSD 20-82-00469-2 (SM2258XT) Short pins
There is no ID at all in your case. Chips are not reading. I recommend you to clean the bottom side of the NAND and try again.
With best regards
ACELab Technical Support
ts.acelab.eu.com
blog.acelab.eu.com
ACELab Technical Support
ts.acelab.eu.com
blog.acelab.eu.com
Return to “PC-3000 Express, UDMA-E, Portable”
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest